The joint investigation was conducted in accordance with the Australian Privacy Act and the UK Data Protection Act 2018. This may have acted as a disincentive to individuals who wish to object to their data being collected and used.” “ asking for additional personal information, including photos, when asked by members of the public if they are on their database.“ failing to meet the higher data protection standards required for biometric data” and.“ failing to have a process in place to stop the data being retained indefinitely”.“ failing to have a lawful reason for collecting people’s information”.“ failing to use the information of people in the UK in a way that is fair and transparent, given that individuals are not made aware or would not reasonably expect their personal data to be used in this way”.The ICO found that Clearview AI Inc breached UK data protection laws by: Interestingly, Clearview AI has challenged this decision with jurisdictional arguments.Ī similar decision is also expected by the Austrian DPA soon.Īlongside the ICO’s monetary penalty notice to Clearview AI for £7,552,800, they have issued an enforcement notice, “ ordering the company to stop obtaining and using the personal data of UK residents that is publicly available on the internet, and to delete the data of UK residents from its systems”. The Italian DPA (the Garante) went one step further in March 2022 and fined Clearview AI €20 million for the unlawful processing of biometric and geolocation data and ordered Clearview AI to prohibit any collection and processing activities in Italy. In December 2021, the French DPA (CNIL) ordered Clearview AI " to stop unlawfully collecting and processing the personal data of data subjects on the French territory”. Recent decisions by the EU Data Protection Authorities (“DPA”) Globally, Clearview AI has stored more than “20 billion faces” which are scraped from Facebook, Instagram and other platforms. It is an American facial recognition business which describes itself as the “ World’s largest facial network”, and has been used by law enforcement bodies in the US and in the UK to assist with criminal prosecutions. In its provisional notice, it also ordered the company to stop processing the personal data of people in the UK following 'alleged serious breaches of the UK’s data protection laws'.Ĭlearview AI has gained a lot of controversial press since the New York Times exposé in 2021. The ICO’s final fine is 45% less than the original amount proposed on 29 November 2021, where the ICO issued a provisional £17 million fine. This is one of the largest fines issued under the UK GDPR to date. Following similar decisions from other data protection authorities, the ICO has fined Clearview AI £7,552,800 for using images of people in the UK, that were collected from the internet and social media to create a global online database that could be used for facial recognition. The ICO began its investigation in 2020 together with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (the “ OAIC”). On, the UK’s Information Commissioner (the “ ICO”) confirmed that it had concluded its investigation into the facial recognition company, Clearview AI Inc (“ Clearview AI” ). Facial recognition: Clearview AI fined more than £7.5m by the ICO
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |